The evolution of the star formation activity in galaxies and its dependence on environment
Abstract
We study how the proportion of star-forming galaxies evolves between z=0.8 and z=0 as a function of galaxy environment, using the [OII] line in emission as a signature of ongoing star formation. Our high-z dataset comprises 16 clusters, 10 groups and another 250 galaxies in poorer groups and the field at z=0.4-0.8 from the ESO Distant Cluster Survey, plus another 9 massive clusters at similar redshifts. As a local comparison, we use samples of galaxy systems selected from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey at 0.04< z < 0.08. At high-z most systems follow a broad anticorrelation between the fraction of star-forming galaxies and the system velocity dispersion. At face value, this suggests that at z=0.4-0.8 the mass of the system largely determines the proportion of galaxies with ongoing star formation. At these redshifts the strength of star formation (as measured by the [OII] equivalent width) in star-forming galaxies is also found to vary systematically with environment. Sloan clusters have much lower fractions of star-forming galaxies than clusters at z=0.4-0.8 and, in contrast with the distant clusters, show a plateau for velocity dispersions , where the fraction of galaxies with [OII] emission does not vary systematically with velocity dispersion. We quantify the evolution of the proportion of star-forming galaxies as a function of the system velocity dispersion and find it is strongest in intermediate-mass systems (sigma ~ 500-600 km s^-1 at z=0). To understand the origin of the observed trends, we use the Press-Schechter formalism and the Millennium Simulation and show that galaxy star formation histories may be closely related to the growth history of clusters and groups. We propose a scheme that is able to account for the observed relations between the star-forming fraction and \sigma [abridged].
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.astro-ph/0512391,
title = {The evolution of the star formation activity in galaxies and its dependence on environment},
author = {B. M. Poggianti and A. von der Linden and G. De Lucia and V. Desai and L. Simard and C. Halliday and A. Aragon-Salamanca and R. Bower and J. Varela and P. Best and D. I. Clowe and J. Dalcanton and P. Jablonka and B. Milvang-Jensen and R. Pello and G. Rudnick and R. Saglia and S. D. M. White and D. Zaritsky},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:astro-ph/0512391},
year = {2009}
}
Comments
28 pages, 19 figures, ApJ in press