English

The Elastic Lottery Ticket Hypothesis

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2021-10-29 v3 Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning Machine Learning

Abstract

Lottery Ticket Hypothesis (LTH) raises keen attention to identifying sparse trainable subnetworks, or winning tickets, which can be trained in isolation to achieve similar or even better performance compared to the full models. Despite many efforts being made, the most effective method to identify such winning tickets is still Iterative Magnitude-based Pruning (IMP), which is computationally expensive and has to be run thoroughly for every different network. A natural question that comes in is: can we "transform" the winning ticket found in one network to another with a different architecture, yielding a winning ticket for the latter at the beginning, without re-doing the expensive IMP? Answering this question is not only practically relevant for efficient "once-for-all" winning ticket finding, but also theoretically appealing for uncovering inherently scalable sparse patterns in networks. We conduct extensive experiments on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet, and propose a variety of strategies to tweak the winning tickets found from different networks of the same model family (e.g., ResNets). Based on these results, we articulate the Elastic Lottery Ticket Hypothesis (E-LTH): by mindfully replicating (or dropping) and re-ordering layers for one network, its corresponding winning ticket could be stretched (or squeezed) into a subnetwork for another deeper (or shallower) network from the same family, whose performance is nearly the same competitive as the latter's winning ticket directly found by IMP. We have also extensively compared E-LTH with pruning-at-initialization and dynamic sparse training methods, as well as discussed the generalizability of E-LTH to different model families, layer types, and across datasets. Code is available at https://github.com/VITA-Group/ElasticLTH.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2103.16547,
  title  = {The Elastic Lottery Ticket Hypothesis},
  author = {Xiaohan Chen and Yu Cheng and Shuohang Wang and Zhe Gan and Jingjing Liu and Zhangyang Wang},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.16547},
  year   = {2021}
}

Comments

Accepted at NeurIPS 2021

R2 v1 2026-06-24T00:42:13.893Z