English

The distance of quasar outflows from the central source: The first consistent values from emission and absorption determinations

Astrophysics of Galaxies 2025-02-27 v1

Abstract

Measuring the distance of quasar outflows from the central source (RR) is essential for determining their importance for AGN feedback. There are two methods to measure RR: 1) A direct determination using spatially resolved Integral Field Spectroscopy (IFS) of the outflow in emission. 2) An indirect method which uses the absorption troughs from ionic excited states. The column density ratio between the excited and resonance states yields the outflow number density. Combined with a knowledge of the outflow's ionization parameter, RR can be determined. Generally, the IFS method probes RR range of several kpc or more, while the absorption method usually yields RR values of less than 1 kpc. There is no inconsistency between the two methods as the determinations come from different objects. Here we report the results of applying both methods to the same quasar outflow, where we derive consistent determinations of RR \approx 5 kpc. This is the first time where the indirect absorption RR determination is verified by a direct spatially resolved IFS observation. In addition, the velocities (and energetics) from the IFS and absorption data are also found to be consistent. Therefore, these are two manifestations of the same outflow. In this paper we concentrate on the absorption RR determination for the outflow seen in quasar 3C 191 using VLT/X-shooter observations. We also reanalyze an older absorption determination for the outflow based on Keck/HIRES data and find that revised measurement to be consistent with ours. Our companion paper details the IFS analysis of the same object.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2502.18825,
  title  = {The distance of quasar outflows from the central source: The first consistent values from emission and absorption determinations},
  author = {Mayank Sharma and Nahum Arav and Qinyuan Zhao and Maryam Dehghanian and Doyee Byun and Gwen Walker and Luming Sun and Lu Shen and Yulong Gao and Guilin Liu and Junfeng Wang},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.18825},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

18 pages, 11 figures. Accepted for publication in ApJ along with the companion paper