English

The computational power of random quantum circuits in arbitrary geometries

Quantum Physics 2025-05-15 v3

Abstract

Empirical evidence for a gap between the computational powers of classical and quantum computers has been provided by experiments that sample the output distributions of two-dimensional quantum circuits. Many attempts to close this gap have utilized classical simulations based on tensor network techniques, and their limitations shed light on the improvements to quantum hardware required to frustrate classical simulability. In particular, quantum computers having in excess of 50\sim 50 qubits are primarily vulnerable to classical simulation due to restrictions on their gate fidelity and their connectivity, the latter determining how many gates are required (and therefore how much infidelity is suffered) in generating highly-entangled states. Here, we describe recent hardware upgrades to Quantinuum's H2 quantum computer enabling it to operate on up to 5656 qubits with arbitrary connectivity and 99.843(5)%99.843(5)\% two-qubit gate fidelity. Utilizing the flexible connectivity of H2, we present data from random circuit sampling in highly connected geometries, doing so at unprecedented fidelities and a scale that appears to be beyond the capabilities of state-of-the-art classical algorithms. The considerable difficulty of classically simulating H2 is likely limited only by qubit number, demonstrating the promise and scalability of the QCCD architecture as continued progress is made towards building larger machines.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2406.02501,
  title  = {The computational power of random quantum circuits in arbitrary geometries},
  author = {Matthew DeCross and Reza Haghshenas and Minzhao Liu and Enrico Rinaldi and Johnnie Gray and Yuri Alexeev and Charles H. Baldwin and John P. Bartolotta and Matthew Bohn and Eli Chertkov and Julia Cline and Jonhas Colina and Davide DelVento and Joan M. Dreiling and Cameron Foltz and John P. Gaebler and Thomas M. Gatterman and Christopher N. Gilbreth and Joshua Giles and Dan Gresh and Alex Hall and Aaron Hankin and Azure Hansen and Nathan Hewitt and Ian Hoffman and Craig Holliman and Ross B. Hutson and Trent Jacobs and Jacob Johansen and Patricia J. Lee and Elliot Lehman and Dominic Lucchetti and Danylo Lykov and Ivaylo S. Madjarov and Brian Mathewson and Karl Mayer and Michael Mills and Pradeep Niroula and Juan M. Pino and Conrad Roman and Michael Schecter and Peter E. Siegfried and Bruce G. Tiemann and Curtis Volin and James Walker and Ruslan Shaydulin and Marco Pistoia and Steven. A. Moses and David Hayes and Brian Neyenhuis and Russell P. Stutz and Michael Foss-Feig},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.02501},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

Includes minor updates to the text and an updated author list to include researchers who made technical contributions in upgrading the machine to 56 qubits but were left off the original version by mistake

R2 v1 2026-06-28T16:53:15.630Z