English

The Cauchy-Dirichlet Problem for Singular Nonlocal Diffusions on Bounded Domains

Analysis of PDEs 2022-08-01 v2

Abstract

We study the homogeneous Cauchy-Dirichlet Problem (CDP) for a nonlinear and nonlocal diffusion equation of singular type of the form tu=Lum\partial_t u =-\mathcal{L} u^m posed on a bounded Euclidean domain ΩRN\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^N with smooth boundary and N1N\ge 1. The linear diffusion operator L\mathcal{L} is a sub-Markovian operator, allowed to be of nonlocal type, while the nonlinearity is of singular type, namely um=um1uu^m=|u|^{m-1}u with 0<m<10<m<1. The prototype equation is the Fractional Fast Diffusion Equation (FFDE), when L\mathcal{L} is one of the three possible Dirichlet Fractional Laplacians on Ω\Omega. Our main results shall provide a complete basic theory for solutions to (CDP): existence and uniqueness in the biggest class of data known so far, both for nonnegative and signed solutions; sharp smoothing estimates: besides the classical LpLL^p-L^\infty smoothing effects, we provide new weighted estimates, which represent a novelty also in well studied local case, i.e. for solutions to the FDE ut=Δumu_t=\Delta u^m. We compare two strategies to prove smoothing effects: Moser iteration VS Green function method. Due to the singular nonlinearity and to presence of nonlocal diffusion operators, the question of how solutions satisfy the lateral boundary conditions is delicate. We answer with quantitative upper boundary estimates that show how boundary data are taken. Once solutions exists and are bounded we show that they extinguish in finite time and we provide upper and lower estimates for the extinction time, together with explicit sharp extinction rates in different norms. The methods of this paper are constructive, in the sense that all the relevant constants involved in the estimates are computable.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2203.12545,
  title  = {The Cauchy-Dirichlet Problem for Singular Nonlocal Diffusions on Bounded Domains},
  author = {Matteo Bonforte and Peio Ibarrondo and Mikel Ispizua},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.12545},
  year   = {2022}
}

Comments

55 pages, 3 figures. In the second version, we have corrected some typos and simplified the proof of Theorem 2.4 (Step 4)

R2 v1 2026-06-24T10:23:38.622Z