English

The $B$ Anomalies and New Physics in $b \to s e^+ e^-$

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology 2019-08-14 v2

Abstract

We investigate the implications of the latest LHCb measurement of RKR_K for NP explanations of the BB anomalies. The previous data could be explained if the bsμ+μb \to s \mu^+ \mu^- NP is in (I) C9,NPμμC_{9,{\rm NP}}^{\mu\mu} or (II) C9,NPμμ=C10,NPμμC_{9,{\rm NP}}^{\mu\mu} = -C_{10,{\rm NP}}^{\mu\mu}, with scenario (I) providing a better explanation than scenario (II). This continues to hold with the new measurement of RKR_K. However, for both scenarios, this measurement leads to a slight tension of O(1σ)O(1\sigma) between separate fits to the bsμ+μb \to s \mu^+ \mu^- and RK()R_{K^{(*)}} data. In this paper, we investigate whether this tension can be alleviated with the addition of NP in bse+eb \to s e^+ e^-. In particular, we examine the effect of adding such NP to scenarios (I) and (II). We find several scenarios in which this leads to improvements in the fits. ZZ' and LQ models with contributions to both bsμ+μb \to s \mu^+ \mu^- and bse+eb \to s e^+ e^- can reproduce the data, but only within scenarios based on (II). If the tension persists in future measurements, it may be necessary to consider NP models with more than one particle contributing to bs+b \to s \ell^+ \ell^-.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1903.10086,
  title  = {The $B$ Anomalies and New Physics in $b \to s e^+ e^-$},
  author = {Alakabha Datta and Jacky Kumar and David London},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.10086},
  year   = {2019}
}

Comments

16 pages, 5 figures. (1) Replaced all qualitative comparisons of scenarios by quantitative comparisons using p-values. (2) Removed all LFU/LFUV descriptions of scenarios, leaving only: we show the addition of NP to $b \to s e^+ e^-$ (LFUV NP) can improve the description of data. This is in contrast to other analyses, that claim that additional LFU NP is required. Made other minor changes to text

R2 v1 2026-06-23T08:17:39.177Z