English

The Angular-Diameter-Distance-Maximum and Its Redshift as Constraints on $\Lambda \neq 0$ FLRW Models

Astrophysics 2009-06-23 v3

Abstract

The plethora of recent cosmologically relevant data has indicated that our universe is very well fit by a standard Friedmann-Lema\^{i}tre-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) model, with ΩM0.27\Omega_{M} \approx 0.27 and ΩΛ0.73\Omega_{\Lambda} \approx 0.73 -- or, more generally, by nearly flat FLRW models with parameters close to these values. Additional independent cosmological information, particularly the maximum of the angular-diameter (observer-area) distance and the redshift at which it occurs, would improve and confirm these results, once sufficient precise Supernovae Ia data in the range 1.5<z<1.81.5 < z < 1.8 become available. We obtain characteristic FLRW closed functional forms for C=C(z)C = C(z) and M^0=M^0(z)\hat{M}_0 = \hat{M}_0(z), the angular-diameter distance and the density per source counted, respectively, when Λ0\Lambda \neq 0, analogous to those we have for Λ=0\Lambda = 0. More importantly, we verify that for flat FLRW models zmaxz_{max} -- as is already known but rarely recognized -- the redshift of CmaxC_{max}, the maximum of the angular-diameter-distance, uniquely gives ΩΛ\Omega_{\Lambda}, the amount of vacuum energy in the universe, independently of H0H_0, the Hubble parameter. For non-flat models determination of both zmaxz_{max} and CmaxC_{max} gives both ΩΛ\Omega_{\Lambda} and ΩM\Omega_M, the amount of matter in the universe, as long as we know H0H_0 independently. Finally, determination of CmaxC_{max} automatically gives a very simple observational criterion for whether or not the universe is flat -- presuming that it is FLRW.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.0705.1846,
  title  = {The Angular-Diameter-Distance-Maximum and Its Redshift as Constraints on $\Lambda \neq 0$ FLRW Models},
  author = {M. E. Araújo and W. R. Stoeger},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:0705.1846},
  year   = {2009}
}
R2 v1 2026-06-21T08:27:51.131Z