English

The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: Power-spectrum analysis of the final dataset and cosmological implications

Astrophysics 2008-11-26 v2

Abstract

We present a power spectrum analysis of the final 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey, employing a direct Fourier method. The sample used comprises 221,414 galaxies with measured redshifts. We investigate in detail the modelling of the sample selection. A new angular mask is derived, based on revisions to the photometric calibration. The redshift selection function is determined by dividing the survey according to rest-frame colour, and deducing a self-consistent treatment of k-corrections and evolution for each population. The covariance matrix for the power-spectrum estimates is determined using two different approaches to the construction of mock surveys which are used to demonstrate that the input cosmological model can be correctly recovered. We are confident that the 2dFGRS power spectrum can be used to infer the matter content of the universe. On large scales, our estimated power spectrum shows evidence for the `baryon oscillations' that are predicted in CDM models. Fitting to a CDM model, assuming a primordial ns=1n_{s}=1 spectrum, h=0.72h=0.72 and negligible neutrino mass, the preferred parameters are ΩMh=0.168±0.016\Omega_{M} h = 0.168 \pm 0.016 and a baryon fraction Ωb/ΩM=0.185±0.046\Omega_{b} /\Omega_{M} = 0.185\pm0.046 (1σ\sigma errors). The value of ΩMh\Omega_{M} h is 1σ1\sigma lower than the 0.20±0.030.20 \pm 0.03 in our 2001 analysis of the partially complete 2dFGRS. This shift is largely due to the signal from the newly-sampled regions of space, rather than the refinements in the treatment of observational selection. This analysis therefore implies a density significantly below the standard ΩM=0.3\Omega_{M} =0.3: in combination with CMB data from WMAP, we infer ΩM=0.231±0.021\Omega_{M} =0.231\pm 0.021. (Abridged.)

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.astro-ph/0501174,
  title  = {The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: Power-spectrum analysis of the final dataset and cosmological implications},
  author = {S. Cole and W. J. Percival and J. A. Peacock and P. Norberg and C. M. Baugh and C. S. Frenk and I. Baldry and J. Bland-Hawthorn and T. Bridges and R. Cannon and M. Colless and C. Collins and W. Couch and N. J. G. Cross and G. Dalton and V. R. Eke and R. De Propris and S. P. Driver and G. Efstathiou and R. S. Ellis and K. Glazebrook and C. Jackson and A. Jenkins and O. Lahav and I. Lewis and S. Lumsden and S. Maddox and D. Madgwick and B. A. Peterson and W. Sutherland and K. Taylor},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:astro-ph/0501174},
  year   = {2008}
}

Comments

Updated to match the in press MNRAS version. P(k) data and covariance matrix available at http://www.mso.anu.edu.au/2dFGRS/Public/Release/PowSpec