"That's Not Good Science!": An Argument for the Thoughtful Use of Formative Situations in Research through Design
Abstract
Most currently accepted approaches to evaluating Research through Design (RtD) presume that design prototypes are finalized and ready for robust testing in laboratory or in-the-wild settings. However, it is also valuable to assess designs at intermediate phases with mid-fidelity prototypes, not just to inform an ongoing design process, but also to glean knowledge of broader use to the research community. We propose 'formative situations' as a frame for examining mid-fidelity prototypes-in-process in this way. We articulate a set of criteria to help the community better assess the rigor of formative situations, in the service of opening conversation about establishing formative situations as a valuable contribution type within the RtD community.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2404.01848,
title = {"That's Not Good Science!": An Argument for the Thoughtful Use of Formative Situations in Research through Design},
author = {Raquel B Robinson and Anya Osborne and Chen Ji and James Collin Fey and Ella Dagan and Katherine Isbister},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.01848},
year = {2024}
}
Comments
8 pages, 1 figure