Various standardized tests exist that assess individuals' visualization literacy. Their use can help to draw conclusions from studies. However, it is not taken into account that the test itself can create a pressure situation where participants might fear being exposed and assessed negatively. This is especially problematic when testing domain experts in design studies. We conducted interviews with experts from different domains performing the Mini-VLAT test for visualization literacy to identify potential problems. Our participants reported that the time limit per question, ambiguities in the questions and visualizations, and missing steps in the test procedure mainly had an impact on their performance and content. We discuss possible changes to the test design to address these issues and how such assessment methods could be integrated into existing evaluation procedures.
@article{arxiv.2409.08101,
title = {Testing the Test: Observations When Assessing Visualization Literacy of Domain Experts},
author = {Seyda Öney and Moataz Abdelaal and Kuno Kurzhals and Paul Betz and Cordula Kropp and Daniel Weiskopf},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.08101},
year = {2024}
}