English

Testing gravitational waveform models using angular momentum

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology 2021-12-30 v2

Abstract

The anticipated enhancements in detector sensitivity and the corresponding increase in the number of gravitational wave detections will make it possible to estimate parameters of compact binaries with greater accuracy assuming general relativity(GR), and also to carry out sharper tests of GR itself. Crucial to these procedures are accurate gravitational waveform models. The systematic errors of the models must stay below statistical errors to prevent biases in parameter estimation and to carry out meaningful tests of GR. Comparisons of the models against numerical relativity (NR) waveforms provide an excellent measure of systematic errors. A complementary approach is to use balance laws provided by Einstein's equations to measure faithfulness of a candidate waveform against exact GR. Each balance law focuses on a physical observable and measures the accuracy of the candidate waveform vis a vis that observable. Therefore, this analysis can provide new physical insights into sources of errors. In this paper we focus on the angular momentum balance law, using post-Newtonian theory to calculate the initial angular momentum, surrogate fits to obtain the remnant spin and waveforms from models to calculate the flux. The consistency check provided by the angular momentum balance law brings out the marked improvement in the passage from \texttt{IMRPhenomPv2} to \texttt{IMRPhenomXPHM} and from \texttt{SEOBNRv3} to \texttt{SEOBNRv4PHM} and shows that the most recent versions agree quite well with exact GR. For precessing systems, on the other hand, we find that there is room for further improvement, especially for the Phenom models.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2107.09536,
  title  = {Testing gravitational waveform models using angular momentum},
  author = {Neev Khera and Abhay Ashtekar and Badri Krishnan},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.09536},
  year   = {2021}
}

Comments

12 pages, 6 figures. Appendix B added to provide heat maps showing the degree of violation of the angular momentum balance law in various non-precessing and precessing models, as functions of the binary parameters