English

Test of the hyperon-nucleon interaction within leading order covariant chiral effective field theory

Nuclear Theory 2022-04-06 v2 High Energy Physics - Experiment High Energy Physics - Lattice High Energy Physics - Phenomenology Nuclear Experiment

Abstract

Motivated by the recent experimental measurements of differential cross sections of the Σp\Sigma^{-}p elastic scattering in the momentum range of 470470 to 850850 MeV/c/c by the J-PARC E4040 experiment, we extend our previous studies of S=1S=-1 hyperon-nucleon interactions to relatively higher energies up to 900900 MeV/c/c for both the coupled-channel Λp(Λp,Σ+n,Σ0p)\Lambda p\rightarrow(\Lambda p, \Sigma^{+}n, \Sigma^{0}p), Σp(Λn,Σ0n,Σp)\Sigma^{-}p\rightarrow(\Lambda n, \Sigma^{0}n, \Sigma^{-}p) and single-channel Σ+pΣ+p\Sigma^{+}p\rightarrow\Sigma^{+}p reactions. We show that although the leading order covariant chiral effective field theory is only constrained by the low energy data, it can describe the high energy data reasonably well, in particular, the J-PARC E40 differential cross sections. The predicted cusp structure close to the ΣN\Sigma N threshold in the ΛpΛp\Lambda p\to \Lambda p reaction agrees with the latest ALICE observation as well as with the results of the next-to-leading order heavy baryon chiral effective theory. On the other hand, the comparison with the latest CLAS data on the Λp\Lambda p cross sections between 0.9 and 2.0 GeV/c/c clearly indicates the need of higher order chiral potentials for such high momenta. This is also the case for the latest J-PARC data on the ΣpΛn\Sigma p \rightarrow \Lambda n differential cross sections. Nevertheless, even for these cases, the predictions are in qualitative agreement with the data, albeit with large uncertainties, implying that the predicted total and differential cross sections are of relevance for ongoing and planned experiments.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2107.04742,
  title  = {Test of the hyperon-nucleon interaction within leading order covariant chiral effective field theory},
  author = {Jing Song and Zhi-Wei Liu and Kai-Wen Li and Li-Sheng Geng},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.04742},
  year   = {2022}
}

Comments

11 pages, 7 figures, comparison with the latest J-PARC and CLAS data made, uncertainty estimates updated, to appear in Physical Review C