Terahertz Water Masers: II. Further SOFIA/GREAT Detections toward Circumstellar Outflows, and a Multitransition Analysis
Abstract
Following up on our discovery of terahertz water masers, reported in 2017, we report two further detections of water maser emission at frequencies above 1 THz. Using the GREAT instrument on SOFIA, we have detected emission in the 1.296411 THz transition of water toward two additional oxygen-rich evolved stars, omicron Ceti (Mira) and R Crateris, and obtained an upper limit on the 1.296 THz line emission from U Orionis. Toward these three sources, and toward the red supergiant star VY Canis Majorae from which 1.296 THz line emission was reported previously, we have also observed several lower-frequency (sub)millimeter water maser transitions using the APEX 12-m telescope along with the 22 GHz transition using the Effelsberg 100-m telescope. We have used a simple model to analyse the multi-transition data thereby obtained. Adopting, as a prior, independent literature estimates of the mass-loss-rates in these four sources and in W Hydrae, we infer water abundances in a remarkably narrow range: . For o Cet, VY CMa, and W Hya, the model is successful in predicting the maser line fluxes to within a typical factor . For R Crt and U Ori, the model is less successful, with typical line flux predictions lying an order of magnitude above or below the observations; such discrepancies are perhaps unsurprising given the exponential nature of maser amplification.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2011.01807,
title = {Terahertz Water Masers: II. Further SOFIA/GREAT Detections toward Circumstellar Outflows, and a Multitransition Analysis},
author = {David A. Neufeld and Karl M. Menten and Carlos Durán and Rolf Güsten and Michael J. Kaufman and Alex Kraus and Parichay Mazumdar and Gary J. Melnick and Gisela Ortiz-León and Helmut Wiesemeyer and Friedrich Wyrowski},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.01807},
year = {2021}
}
Comments
37 pages, including 10 figures. Accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal. Two typos corrected: in two instances the ratio n(H2O)/n(H2) had erroneously been inverted in version 1