English

Terahertz Security Image Quality Assessment by No-reference Model Observers

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2017-10-04 v2

Abstract

To provide the possibility of developing objective image quality assessment (IQA) algorithms for THz security images, we constructed the THz security image database (THSID) including a total of 181 THz security images with the resolution of 127*380. The main distortion types in THz security images were first analyzed for the design of subjective evaluation criteria to acquire the mean opinion scores. Subsequently, the existing no-reference IQA algorithms, which were 5 opinion-aware approaches viz., NFERM, GMLF, DIIVINE, BRISQUE and BLIINDS2, and 8 opinion-unaware approaches viz., QAC, SISBLIM, NIQE, FISBLIM, CPBD, S3 and Fish_bb, were executed for the evaluation of the THz security image quality. The statistical results demonstrated the superiority of Fish_bb over the other testing IQA approaches for assessing the THz image quality with PLCC (SROCC) values of 0.8925 (-0.8706), and with RMSE value of 0.3993. The linear regression analysis and Bland-Altman plot further verified that the Fish__bb could substitute for the subjective IQA. Nonetheless, for the classification of THz security images, we tended to use S3 as a criterion for ranking THz security image grades because of the relatively low false positive rate in classifying bad THz image quality into acceptable category (24.69%). Interestingly, due to the specific property of THz image, the average pixel intensity gave the best performance than the above complicated IQA algorithms, with the PLCC, SROCC and RMSE of 0.9001, -0.8800 and 0.3857, respectively. This study will help the users such as researchers or security staffs to obtain the THz security images of good quality. Currently, our research group is attempting to make this research more comprehensive.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1707.03574,
  title  = {Terahertz Security Image Quality Assessment by No-reference Model Observers},
  author = {Menghan Hu and Xiongkuo Min and Guangtao Zhai and Wenhan Zhu and Yucheng Zhu and Zhaodi Wang and Xiaokang Yang and Guang Tian},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.03574},
  year   = {2017}
}

Comments

13 pages, 8 figures, 4 tables

R2 v1 2026-06-22T20:44:22.984Z