Tempo vs. Pitch: understanding self-supervised tempo estimation
Abstract
Self-supervision methods learn representations by solving pretext tasks that do not require human-generated labels, alleviating the need for time-consuming annotations. These methods have been applied in computer vision, natural language processing, environmental sound analysis, and recently in music information retrieval, e.g. for pitch estimation. Particularly in the context of music, there are few insights about the fragility of these models regarding different distributions of data, and how they could be mitigated. In this paper, we explore these questions by dissecting a self-supervised model for pitch estimation adapted for tempo estimation via rigorous experimentation with synthetic data. Specifically, we study the relationship between the input representation and data distribution for self-supervised tempo estimation.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2304.06868,
title = {Tempo vs. Pitch: understanding self-supervised tempo estimation},
author = {Giovana Morais and Matthew E. P. Davies and Marcelo Queiroz and Magdalena Fuentes},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.06868},
year = {2023}
}
Comments
5 pages, 3 figures, published on 2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing