English

Systematic difference between ionized and molecular gas velocity dispersion in $z\sim1-2$ disks and local analogues

Astrophysics of Galaxies 2021-03-10 v1

Abstract

We compare the molecular and ionized gas velocity dispersion of 9 nearby turbulent disks, analogues to high-redshift galaxies, from the DYNAMO sample using new ALMA and GMOS/Gemini observations. We combine our sample with 12 galaxies at zz\sim 0.5-2.5 from the literature. We find that the resolved velocity dispersion is systematically lower by a factor 2.45±0.382.45\pm0.38 for the molecular gas compared to the ionized gas, after correcting for thermal broadening. This offset is constant within the galaxy disks and indicates the co-existence of a thin molecular and thick ionized gas disks. This result has a direct impact on the Toomre QQ and pressure derived in galaxies. We obtain pressures 0.22\sim0.22 dex lower on average when using the molecular gas velocity dispersion, σ0,mol\sigma_{0,mol}. We find that σ0,mol\sigma_{0,mol} increases with gas fraction and star formation rate. We also obtain an increase with redshift and show that the EAGLE and FIRE simulations overall overestimate σ0,mol\sigma_{0,mol} at high redshift. Our results suggest that efforts to compare the kinematics of gas using ionized gas as a proxy for the total gas may overestimate the velocity dispersion by a significant amount in galaxies at the peak of cosmic star formation. When using the molecular gas as a tracer, our sample is not consistent with predictions from constant efficiency star formation models, even when including transport as a source of turbulence. Feedback models with variable star formation efficiency, ϵff\epsilon_{ff}, and/or feedback efficiency, p/mp_*/m_*, better predict our observations.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2101.04122,
  title  = {Systematic difference between ionized and molecular gas velocity dispersion in $z\sim1-2$ disks and local analogues},
  author = {M. Girard and D. B. Fisher and A. D. Bolatto and R. Abraham and R. Bassett and K. Glazebrook and R. Herrera-Camus and E. Jiménez and L. Lenkić and D. Obreschkow},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.04122},
  year   = {2021}
}

Comments

Accepted for publication in ApJ. 19 pages, 6 figures