English

Symplectic models for Unitary groups

Number Theory 2018-07-03 v2 Representation Theory

Abstract

In analogy with the study of representations of GL2n(F)GL_{2n}(F) distinguished by Sp2n(F)Sp_{2n}(F), where FF is a local field, in this paper we study representations of U2n(F)U_{2n}(F) distinguished by Sp2n(F)Sp_{2n}(F). (Only quasi-split unitary groups are considered in this paper since they are the only ones which contain Sp2n(F)Sp_{2n}(F).) We prove that there are no cuspidal representations of U2n(F)U_{2n}(F) distinguished by Sp2n(F)Sp_{2n}(F) for FF a non-archimedean local field. We also prove the corresponding global theorem that there are no cuspidal representations of U2n(Ak)U_{2n}({\mathbb A}_k) with nonzero period integral on Sp2n(k)\Sp2n(Ak)Sp_{2n}(k) \backslash Sp_{2n}({\mathbb A}_k) for kk any number field or a function field. We completely classify representations of quasi-split unitary group in four variables over local and global fields with nontrivial symplectic periods using methods of theta correspondence. We propose a conjectural answer for the classification of all representations of a quasi-split unitary group distinguished by Sp2n(F)Sp_{2n}(F).

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1611.01621,
  title  = {Symplectic models for Unitary groups},
  author = {Sarah Dijols and Dipendra Prasad},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.01621},
  year   = {2018}
}

Comments

minor changes; to appear in the Transactions of the AMS

R2 v1 2026-06-22T16:42:58.281Z