Summarizing experimental sensitivities of collider experiments to dark matter models and comparison to other experiments
Abstract
Comparisons of the coverage of current and proposed dark matter searches can help us to understand the context in which a discovery of particle dark matter would be made. In some scenarios, a discovery could be reinforced by information from multiple, complementary types of experiments; in others, only one experiment would see a signal, giving only a partial, more ambiguous picture; in still others, no experiment would be sensitive and new approaches would be needed. In this whitepaper, we present an update to a similar study performed for the European Strategy Briefing Book performed within the dark matter at the Energy Frontier (EF10) Snowmass Topical Group We take as a starting point a set of projections for future collider facilities and a method of graphical comparisons routinely performed for LHC DM searches using simplified models recommended by the LHC Dark Matter Working Group and also used for the BSM and dark matter chapters of the European Strategy Briefing Book. These comparisons can also serve as launching point for cross-frontier discussions about dark matter complementarity.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2206.03456,
title = {Summarizing experimental sensitivities of collider experiments to dark matter models and comparison to other experiments},
author = {Antonio Boveia and Caterina Doglioni and Boyu Gao and Josh Greaves and Philip Harris and Katherine Pachal and Etienne Dreyer and Giuliano Gustavino and Robert Harris and Daniel Hayden and Tetiana Hrynova and Ashutosh Kotwal and Jared Little and Kevin Black and Tulika Bose and Yuze Chen and Sridhara Dasu and Haoyi Jia and Deborah Pinna and Varun Sharma and Nikhilesh Venkatasubramanian and Carl Vuosalo},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.03456},
year = {2022}
}
Comments
Submitted to the Proceedings of the US Community Study on the Future of Particle Physics (Snowmass 2021)