English

Strong field gravitational lensing by hairy Kerr black holes

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology 2021-06-30 v5

Abstract

Recent times witnessed a surge of interest in strong gravitational lensing by black holes due to the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) results, which suggest comparing the black hole lensing in general relativity and modified gravity theories. This may help us to assess the phenomenological differences between these models. A Kerr black hole is also a solution to some alternative theories of gravity, while recently obtained modified Kerr black holes (hairy Kerr black holes), which evade the no-hair theorem, are due to additional sources from surrounding fluid, like dark matter, having conserved energy momentum tensor (EMT). These hairy Kerr black holes may also be solutions to an alternative theory of gravity. We generalize previous work on gravitational lensing by a Kerr black hole in the strong deflection limits to the hairy Kerr black holes, with a deviation parameter α\alpha and a primary hair 0\ell_0. Interestingly, the deflection coefficient aˉ\bar{a} increases and decreases with increasing 0\ell_0 and α\alpha respectively. bˉ\bar{b} shows opposite behaviour with 0\ell_0 and α\alpha. We also find that the deflection angle αD\alpha_D, angular position θ\theta_{\infty} and umu_{m} decrease, but angular separation ss increases with α\alpha. We compare our results with those for Kerr black holes, and also apply the formalism to discuss the astrophysical consequences in the context of the supermassive black holes Sgr A* and M87*. We observe that the deviations of the angular positions from that of the Kerr black hole are not more than 2.6 μ2.6~\muas for Sgr A* and 1.96 μ1.96~\muas for M87*, which are unlikely to be resolved by the current EHT observations.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2102.08289,
  title  = {Strong field gravitational lensing by hairy Kerr black holes},
  author = {Shafqat Ul Islam and Sushant G. Ghosh},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.08289},
  year   = {2021}
}

Comments

17 pages, 7 figures, 8 tables, minor typos corrected, accepted in Phys. Rev. D