Stopping on the last success with unknown odds: Impossibility barriers and quantitative oracle bounds
Abstract
We consider the classical last-success problem for sequential Bernoulli trials in the homogeneous setting where are i.i.d. but the success probability is unknown to the decision maker. When is known, Bruss' sum-the-odds theorem yields an optimal threshold rule with value . We study a natural oracle-free plug-in rule that replaces by the online empirical estimate and we denote its win probability by . First, we derive an exact expression for via a recursion for the state probabilities, enabling explicit comparisons with and revealing a finite-horizon separation between plug-in and oracle performance. Next, we formalize a first decision-theoretic obstruction inherent to the unknown- formulation: for every fixed , the dominance partial order on -blind (possibly randomized) rules has no greatest element. We then identify regimes where oracle-freeness is achievable with sharp bounds. For any , we establish finite-horizon oracle bounds on and we prove a matching minimax lower bound of order for (larger values of do not allow for non-trivial lower bounds). We also show that the rate is exponential for any fixed . In sparse regimes where with , we prove asymptotic oracle-optimality of the plug-in rule, in the sense that . Together with our non-sparse bounds, this yields a broad uniform convergence guarantee, which we show cannot be extended to the critical regime . Finally, we establish another impossibility barrier: even allowing randomization, no oracle-free sequence of rules can converge uniformly to the oracle value over .
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2604.07183,
title = {Stopping on the last success with unknown odds: Impossibility barriers and quantitative oracle bounds},
author = {Davy Paindaveine},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.07183},
year = {2026}
}
Comments
43 pages, 5 figures