English

Stimulus symmetries can confound representational similarity analyses

Neurons and Cognition 2026-05-21 v1 Machine Learning

Abstract

What can representational similarity matrices (RSMs) tell us about a neural code? As the popularity of these summary statistics grows, so too does the need for a more complete characterization of their properties. Here, we show that symmetries in network inputs can confound RSM-based analyses. Stimulus symmetries render many representations functionally equivalent, but these different configurations can lead to different RSMs. These different RSMs reflect qualitatively different representational geometries. We show that stochastic gradient descent or energetic regularization can generate sparse, drifting codes, leading in turn to drifting RSMs. Moreover, we demonstrate that these phenomena are present in networks trained to encode image data, where the symmetry is latent. Our results illustrate the challenges inherent in comparing nonlinear neural codes, when functionally-equivalent representations are not related by a simple rotation.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2605.21324,
  title  = {Stimulus symmetries can confound representational similarity analyses},
  author = {Farhad Pashakhanloo and Jacob A. Zavatone-Veth},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.21324},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

40 pages

R2 v1 2026-07-22T07:24:17.231Z