English

Stellar mass as a galaxy cluster mass proxy: application to the Dark Energy Survey redMaPPer clusters

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics 2020-03-04 v2

Abstract

We introduce a galaxy cluster mass observable, μ\mu_\star, based on the stellar masses of cluster members, and we present results for the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 observations. Stellar masses are computed using a Bayesian Model Averaging method, and are validated for DES data using simulations and COSMOS data. We show that μ\mu_\star works as a promising mass proxy by comparing our predictions to X-ray measurements. We measure the X-ray temperature-μ\mu_\star relation for a total of 150 clusters matched between the wide-field DES Year 1 redMaPPer catalogue, and Chandra and XMM archival observations, spanning the redshift range 0.1<z<0.70.1<z<0.7. For a scaling relation which is linear in logarithmic space, we find a slope of α=0.488±0.043\alpha = 0.488\pm0.043 and a scatter in the X-ray temperature at fixed μ\mu_\star of σlnTXμ=0.2660.020+0.019\sigma_{{\rm ln} T_X|\mu_\star}=0.266^{+0.019}_{-0.020} for the joint sample. By using the halo mass scaling relations of the X-ray temperature from the Weighing the Giants program, we further derive the μ\mu_\star-conditioned scatter in mass, finding σlnMμ=0.260.10+0.15\sigma_{{\rm ln} M|\mu_\star}=0.26^{+ 0.15}_{- 0.10}. These results are competitive with well-established cluster mass proxies used for cosmological analyses, showing that μ\mu_\star can be used as a reliable and physically motivated mass proxy to derive cosmological constraints.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1903.08813,
  title  = {Stellar mass as a galaxy cluster mass proxy: application to the Dark Energy Survey redMaPPer clusters},
  author = {A. Palmese and J. Annis and J. Burgad and A. Farahi and M. Soares-Santos and B. Welch and M. da Silva Pereira and H. Lin and S. Bhargava and D. L. Hollowood and R. Wilkinson and P. Giles and T. Jeltema and A. K. Romer and A. E. Evrard and M. Hilton and C. Vergara Cervantes and A. Bermeo and J. Mayers and J. DeRose and D. Gruen and W. G. Hartley and O. Lahav and B. Leistedt and T. McClintock and E. Rozo and E. S. Rykoff and T. N. Varga and R. H. Wechsler and Y. Zhang and S. Avila and D. Brooks and E. Buckley-Geer and D. L. Burke and A. Carnero Rosell and M. Carrasco Kind and J. Carretero and F. J. Castander and C. Collins and L. N. da Costa and S. Desai and J. De Vicente and H. T. Diehl and J. P. Dietrich and P. Doel and B. Flaugher and P. Fosalba and J. Frieman and J. Garcia-Bellido and D. W. Gerdes and R. A. Gruendl and J. Gschwend and G. Gutierrez and K. Honscheid and D. J. James and E. Krause and K. Kuehn and N. Kuropatkin and A. Liddle and M. Lima and M. A. G. Maia and R. G. Mann and J. L. Marshall and F. Menanteau and R. Miquel and R. L. C. Ogando and A. A. Plazas and A. Roodman and P. Rooney and M. Sahlen and E. Sanchez and V. Scarpine and M. Schubnell and S. Serrano and I. Sevilla-Noarbe and F. Sobreira and J. Stott and E. Suchyta and M. E. C. Swanson and G. Tarle and D. Thomas and D. L. Tucker and P. T. P. Viana and V. Vikram and A. R. Walker},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.08813},
  year   = {2020}
}

Comments

14 pages, 7 figures, addressing MNRAS referee comments