Stein fillings vs. Milnor fibers
Abstract
Given a link of a normal surface singularity with its canonical contact structure, we compare the collection of its Stein fillings to its Milnor fillings (that is, Milnor fibers of possible smoothings). We prove that, unlike Stein fillings, Milnor fillings of a given link have bounded topology; for links of sandwiched singularities, we further establish that there are only finitely many Milnor fillings. We discuss some other obstructions for a Stein filling to be represented by a Milnor fiber, and for various types of singularities, including simple classes like cusps and triangle singularities, we produce Stein fillings that do not come from Milnor fibers or resolutions.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2403.12216,
title = {Stein fillings vs. Milnor fibers},
author = {R. Inanc Baykur and A. Nemethi and O. Plamenevskaya},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.12216},
year = {2025}
}
Comments
v2 includes several clarifications and removes Theorem 6 (whose proof had a gap), as well as the appendix by Plamenevskaya and Starkston (which will appear in their upcoming work instead)