English

Steep Decay Phase Shaped by the Curvature Effect. I. Flux Evolution

High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena 2017-05-24 v1

Abstract

The curvature effect may be responsible for the steep decay phase observed in gamma-ray bursts. For testing the curvature effect with observations, the zero time point t0t_0 adopted to plot observer time and flux on a logarithmic scale should be appropriately selected. In practice, however, the true t0t_0 cannot be directly constrained from the data. Then, we move t0t_0 to a certain time in the steep decay phase, which can be easily identified. In this situation, we derive an analytical formula to describe the flux evolution of the steep decay phase. The analytical formula is read as Fν(1+t~obs/t~c)αF_\nu\propto (1+\tilde t_{\rm obs}/{\tilde t_c})^{-\alpha} with α(t~obs)=2+0log(1+t~obs/t~c)β(τ)d[log(1+τ/t~c)]/log(1+t~obs/t~c)\alpha(\tilde{t}_{\rm obs})=2+{\int_{0}^{\log (1+\tilde{t}_{\rm obs}/{\tilde{t}_c})} {\beta(\tau)d[\log(1+\tau/{\tilde{t}_c})]}}/{\log (1 + {\tilde t}_{\rm obs}/{{\tilde t}_c})}, where FνF_\nu is the flux observed at frequency ν\nu, t~obs\tilde t_{\rm obs} is the observer time by setting zero time point t0t_0 at a certain time in the steep decay phase, β\beta is the spectral index estimated around ν\nu, and t~c{\tilde t}_c is the decay timescale of the phase with t~obs0\tilde{t}_{\rm obs}{\geqslant}0. We test the analytical formula with the data from numerical calculations. It is found that the analytical formula presents a well estimation about the evolution of flux shaped by the curvature effect. Our analytical formula can be used to confront the curvature effect with observations and estimate the decay timescale of the steep decay phase.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1704.04233,
  title  = {Steep Decay Phase Shaped by the Curvature Effect. I. Flux Evolution},
  author = {Da-Bin Lin and Hui-Jun Mu and Rui-Jing Lu and Tong Liu and Wei-Min Gu and Yun-Feng Liang and Xiang-Gao Wang and En-Wei Liang},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.04233},
  year   = {2017}
}

Comments

28 pages, 18 figures, accepted for publication in ApJ