Status of Cosmological Parameters: $\Omega_0\approx 0.3$ vs. $\Omega=1$
Abstract
The cosmological parameters that I discuss are the Hubble parameter km s Mpc, the age of the universe , the average density , and the cosmological constant . To focus the discussion, I concentrate on the the value of in currently popular models in which most of the dark matter is cold, especially Cold + Hot Dark Matter (CHDM) and flat () low- CDM with a Cosmological Constant (CDM). The evidence would favor small if (1) the Hubble parameter actually has the high value favored by many observers, and Gy; or (2) the baryonic/total mass ratio in clusters of galaxies is actually \%, about 3 times larger than expected for standard BBN in an universe, , despite the recent measurement by Tytler of in two high-redshift Lyman limit systems, implying . The evidence would favor if (1) the POTENT analysis of galaxy peculiar velocity data is right, in particular regarding outflows from voids or the inability to obtain the present-epoch non- Gaussian density distribution from Gaussian initial fluctuations in a low- universe; or (2) the preliminary LSND report indicating neutrino mass eV is right, since that would be too much hot dark matter to allow significant structure formation in a low- CDM model. Statistics on gravitational lensing of quasars provide an upper limit on , and the preliminary results on the deceleration parameter on very large scales from high-redshift Type Ia supernovae suggest that and is small.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.astro-ph/9604184,
title = {Status of Cosmological Parameters: $\Omega_0\approx 0.3$ vs. $\Omega=1$},
author = {Joel R. Primack},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:astro-ph/9604184},
year = {2007}
}
Comments
31 pages. To appear in International School of Physics ``Enrico Fermi'', Course CXXXII: Dark Matter in the Universe, Varenna 1995, eds. S. Bonometto, J.R. Primack, A. Provenzale