English

Statistical-model description of $\gamma$ decay from compound-nucleus resonances

Nuclear Theory 2020-01-27 v2 Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics

Abstract

The statistical model of compound-nucleus reactions predicts that the fluctuations of the partial γ\gamma-decay widths for a compound-nucleus resonance are governed by the Porter-Thomas distribution (PTD), and that consequently the distribution of total γ\gamma-decay widths is very narrow. However, a recent experiment [Koehler, Larsen, Guttormsen, Siem, and Guber, Phys. Rev. C 88, 041305(R) (2013)] reported large fluctuations of the total γ\gamma-decay widths in the 95^{95}Mo(n,γ)96(n,\gamma)^{96}Mo* reaction, contrary to this expectation. Furthermore, in recent theoretical works it was argued that sufficiently strong channel couplings can cause deviations of the partial width distributions from PTD. Here, we investigate whether the combined influence of a large number of nonequivalent γ\gamma-decay channels, each of which couples weakly to the compound-nucleus resonances, can modify the statistics of the partial widths. We study this effect in neutron scattering off 95^{95}Mo within a random-matrix model that includes coupling to the entrance neutron channel and to the large number of γ\gamma channels. Using realistic coupling parameters obtained from empirical models for the level density and the γ\gamma strength function, we find that the PTD describes well the distribution of partial widths for all decay channels, in agreement with the statistical-model expectation. Furthermore, we find that the width of the distribution of the total γ\gamma-decay widths is insensitive to wide variations in the parameters of the γ\gamma strength function, as well as to deviations of the partial-width distributions from the PTD. Our results rule out an explanation of the recent experimental data within a statistical-model description of the compound nucleus.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1909.06250,
  title  = {Statistical-model description of $\gamma$ decay from compound-nucleus resonances},
  author = {P. Fanto and Y. Alhassid and H. A. Weidenmüller},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.06250},
  year   = {2020}
}

Comments

10 pages, 6 figures. Corresponds to the published version