English

Spanning Trees and Redistricting: New Methods for Sampling and Validation

Physics and Society 2025-11-18 v2 Computers and Society

Abstract

Deciding whether a political districting plan was distorted by a hidden agenda, or whether it dilutes the voting power of some group, requires a neutral baseline for comparison. Remarkably, all nine U.S. Supreme Court justices have now signed on to decisions that find that computational methods can provide key evidence. Today, the leading approaches for benchmarking districting plans are based on the use of spanning trees for sampling graph partitions. We present a new *reversible recombination* algorithm and rigorously prove its fundamental properties. Furthermore, we argue for a canonical sampling distribution called the *spanning tree distribution* that is well adapted to redistricting and provides a principled foundation for comparing and validating methods. Together with a highly efficient (and open-source) implementation that can generate and handle large datasets, this work provides the most powerful null model to date for the gerrymandering problem, meeting an urgent democratic challenge with sound scientific methodology.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2210.01401,
  title  = {Spanning Trees and Redistricting: New Methods for Sampling and Validation},
  author = {Sarah Cannon and Moon Duchin and Dana Randall and Parker Rule},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.01401},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

SIREV, to appear

R2 v1 2026-06-28T02:44:56.983Z