English

Some upper bounds for the $\mathbb{A}$-numerical radius of $2\times 2$ block matrices

Functional Analysis 2020-05-12 v1

Abstract

Let A=(A00A)\mathbb{A}=\left( \begin{array}{cc} A & 0 \\ 0 & A \\ \end{array} \right) be the 2×22\times2 diagonal operator matrix determined by a positive bounded operator AA. For semi-Hilbertian operators XX and YY, we first show that \begin{align*} w^2_{\mathbb{A}}\left(\begin{bmatrix} 0 & X \\ Y & 0 \end{bmatrix}\right) &\leq \frac{1}{4}\max\Big\{{\big\|XX^{\sharp_A} + Y^{\sharp_A}Y\big\|}_{A}, {\big\|X^{\sharp_A}X + YY^{\sharp_A}\big\|}_{A}\Big\} + \frac{1}{2}\max\big\{w_{A}(XY), w_{A}(YX)\big\}, \end{align*} where wA()w_{\mathbb{A}}(\cdot), A{\|\cdot\|}_{A} and wA()w_{A}(\cdot) are the A\mathbb{A}-numerical radius, AA-operator seminorm and AA-numerical radius, respectively. We then apply the above inequality to find some upper bounds for the A\mathbb{A}-numerical radius of certain 2×22\times 2 operator matrices. In particular, we obtain some refinements of earlier AA-numerical radius inequalities for semi-Hilbertian operators. An upper bound for the A\mathbb{A}-numerical radius of 2×22\times 2 block matrices of semi-Hilbertian space operators is also given.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2005.04590,
  title  = {Some upper bounds for the $\mathbb{A}$-numerical radius of $2\times 2$ block matrices},
  author = {Qingxiang Xu and Zhongming Ye and Ali Zamani},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.04590},
  year   = {2020}
}

Comments

It is submitted on May 2020 to a research journal