English

Some remarks on L-equivalence of algebraic varieties

Algebraic Geometry 2025-02-10 v3 Category Theory K-Theory and Homology

Abstract

In this short note we study the questions of (non-)L-equivalence of algebraic varieties, in particular, for abelian varieties and K3 surfaces. We disprove the original version of a conjecture of Huybrechts \cite[Conjecture 0.3]{H} stating that isogenous K3 surfaces are L-equivalent. Moreover, we give examples of derived equivalent twisted K3 surfaces, such that the underlying K3 surfaces are not L-equivalent. We also give examples showing that D-equivalent abelian varieties can be non-L-equivalent (the same examples were obtained independently in \cite{IMOU}). This disproves the original version of a conjecture of Kuznetsov and Schinder \cite[Conjecture 1.6]{KS}. We deduce the statements on (non-)L-equivalence from the very general results on the Grothendieck group of an additive category, whose morphisms are finitely generated abelian groups. In particular, we show that in such a category each stable isomorphism class of objects contains only finitely many isomorphism classes. We also show that a stable isomorphism between two objects XX and YY with End(X)=Z\mathrm{End}(X)=\mathbb{Z} implies that XX and YY are isomorphic.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1707.08997,
  title  = {Some remarks on L-equivalence of algebraic varieties},
  author = {Alexander I. Efimov},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.08997},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

11 pages, no figures. v2: minor corrections, a minor mistake in the proof of Corollary 3.5 corrected, a new result added (Proposition 3.7), references added. v3: Final version, to appear in Selecta Mathematica. Minor changes, some proofs expanded, new Lemma 2.4 and Corollary 3.6 added