While large language models demonstrate remarkable capabilities across numerous domains, social intelligence - the capacity to perceive social cues, infer mental states, and generate appropriate responses - remains a critical challenge, particularly for enabling effective human-AI collaboration and developing AI that truly serves human needs. Current models often rely on superficial patterns rather than genuine social reasoning. We argue that cultivating human-like social intelligence requires training with challenging cases that resist shortcut solutions. To this end, we introduce ToMBench-Hard, an adversarial benchmark designed to provide hard training examples for social reasoning. Building on this, we propose Social-R1, a reinforcement learning framework that aligns model reasoning with human cognition through multi-dimensional rewards. Unlike outcome-based RL, Social-R1 supervises the entire reasoning process, enforcing structural alignment, logical integrity, and information density. Results show that our approach enables a 4B parameter model to surpass much larger counterparts and generalize robustly across eight diverse benchmarks. These findings demonstrate that challenging training cases with trajectory-level alignment offer a path toward efficient and reliable social intelligence.
@article{arxiv.2603.09249,
title = {Social-R1: Towards Human-like Social Reasoning in LLMs},
author = {Jincenzi Wu and Yuxuan Lei and Jianxun Lian and Yitian Huang and Lexin Zhou and Haotian Li and Xing Xie and Helen Meng},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.09249},
year = {2026}
}
Comments
27 pages. Code and dataset will be released upon acceptance