Simulation analysis of the Compton-to-peak method for quantifying radiocesium deposition quantities
Abstract
Compton-to-peak analysis is a method for selecting coefficients for converting count rates measured with in situ gamma ray spectrometry to radioactivity concentrations of Cs and Cs in the environment. Compton-to-peak analysis is based on the count rate ratio between the spectral regions containing scattered gamma rays to the primary Cs and Cs photopeaks (known as the Compton-to-peak ratio - RCP). RCP changes with the vertical distribution of Cs and Cs within the ground. Inferring this distribution enables the selection of appropriate count rate to activity concentration conversion coefficients. Here PHITS was used to simulate the dependency of RCP on different vertical distributions of Cs and Cs within the ground. A model was created of a LaBr(Ce) detector used in drone helicopter aerial surveys in Fukushima Prefecture. The model was verified by comparing simulated gamma ray spectra to measurements from test sources. Simulations were performed for the infinite half-space geometry to calculate the dependency of RCP on the mass depth distribution (exponential or uniform) of Cs and Cs within the ground, and on the altitude of the detector above the ground. The calculations suggest that the sensitivity of the Compton-to-peak method is greatest for the initial period following nuclear fallout when Cs and Cs are located close to the ground surface, and for aerial surveys conducted at low altitudes. This is because the relative differences calculated between RCP with respect to changes in the mass depth distribution were largest for these two cases. Data on the measurement height above and on the Cs to Cs activity ratio is necessary for applying the Compton-to-peak method to determine the distribution and radioactivity concentration of Cs and Cs within the ground.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2011.04158,
title = {Simulation analysis of the Compton-to-peak method for quantifying radiocesium deposition quantities},
author = {Alex Malins and Kotaro Ochi and Masahiko Machida and Yukihisa Sanada},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.04158},
year = {2020}
}
Comments
8 pages, 4 figures, Author Accepted Manuscript for the Proceedings of SNA+MC 2020, pp 147-154