English

Simple Transparent Adversarial Examples

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2021-05-21 v1 Artificial Intelligence Cryptography and Security Machine Learning

Abstract

There has been a rise in the use of Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) Vision APIs as they offer multiple services including pre-built models and algorithms, which otherwise take a huge amount of resources if built from scratch. As these APIs get deployed for high-stakes applications, it's very important that they are robust to different manipulations. Recent works have only focused on typical adversarial attacks when evaluating the robustness of vision APIs. We propose two new aspects of adversarial image generation methods and evaluate them on the robustness of Google Cloud Vision API's optical character recognition service and object detection APIs deployed in real-world settings such as sightengine.com, picpurify.com, Google Cloud Vision API, and Microsoft Azure's Computer Vision API. Specifically, we go beyond the conventional small-noise adversarial attacks and introduce secret embedding and transparent adversarial examples as a simpler way to evaluate robustness. These methods are so straightforward that even non-specialists can craft such attacks. As a result, they pose a serious threat where APIs are used for high-stakes applications. Our transparent adversarial examples successfully evade state-of-the art object detections APIs such as Azure Cloud Vision (attack success rate 52%) and Google Cloud Vision (attack success rate 36%). 90% of the images have a secret embedded text that successfully fools the vision of time-limited humans but is detected by Google Cloud Vision API's optical character recognition. Complementing to current research, our results provide simple but unconventional methods on robustness evaluation.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2105.09685,
  title  = {Simple Transparent Adversarial Examples},
  author = {Jaydeep Borkar and Pin-Yu Chen},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.09685},
  year   = {2021}
}

Comments

14 pages, 9 figures, Published at ICLR 2021 Workshop on Security and Safety in Machine Learning Systems

R2 v1 2026-06-24T02:17:55.799Z