English

Short gamma-ray bursts in the "time-reversal" scenario

High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena 2015-06-23 v4 Solar and Stellar Astrophysics General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

Abstract

Short gamma-ray bursts (SGRBs) are among the most luminous explosions in the Universe and their origin still remains uncertain. Observational evidence favors the association with binary neutron star or neutron star-black hole (NS-BH) binary mergers. Leading models relate SGRBs to a relativistic jet launched by the BH-torus system resulting from the merger. However, recent observations have revealed a large fraction of SGRB events accompanied by X-ray afterglows with durations 102 ⁣ ⁣105 s\sim10^2\!-\!10^5~\mathrm{s}, suggesting continuous energy injection from a long-lived central engine, which is incompatible with the short (1 s\lesssim1~\mathrm{s}) accretion timescale of a BH-torus system. The formation of a supramassive NS, resisting the collapse on much longer spin-down timescales, can explain these afterglow durations, but leaves serious doubts on whether a relativistic jet can be launched at merger. Here we present a novel scenario accommodating both aspects, where the SGRB is produced after the collapse of a supramassive NS. Early differential rotation and subsequent spin-down emission generate an optically thick environment around the NS consisting of a photon-pair nebula and an outer shell of baryon-loaded ejecta. While the jet easily drills through this environment, spin-down radiation diffuses outwards on much longer timescales and accumulates a delay that allows the SGRB to be observed before (part of) the long-lasting X-ray signal. By analyzing diffusion timescales for a wide range of physical parameters, we find delays that can generally reach 105 s\sim10^5~\mathrm{s}, compatible with observations. The success of this fundamental test makes this "time-reversal" scenario an attractive alternative to current SGRB models.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1411.2015,
  title  = {Short gamma-ray bursts in the "time-reversal" scenario},
  author = {Riccardo Ciolfi and Daniel M. Siegel},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.2015},
  year   = {2015}
}

Comments

5 pages, 3 figures. Including proof corrections, matching published version