English

Shelah's eventual categoricity conjecture in universal classes: part I

Logic 2017-06-12 v9

Abstract

We prove: Theorem\mathbf{Theorem} Let KK be a universal class. If KK is categorical in cardinals of arbitrarily high cofinality, then KK is categorical on a tail of cardinals. The proof stems from ideas of Adi Jarden and Will Boney, and also relies on a deep result of Shelah. As opposed to previous works, the argument is in ZFC and does not use the assumption of categoricity in a successor cardinal. The argument generalizes to abstract elementary classes (AECs) that satisfy a locality property and where certain prime models exist. Moreover assuming amalgamation we can give an explicit bound on the Hanf number and get rid of the cofinality restrictions: Theorem\mathbf{Theorem} Let KK be an AEC with amalgamation. Assume that KK is fully LS(K)\operatorname{LS} (K)-tame and short and has primes over sets of the form M{a}M \cup \{a\}. Write H2:=(2(2LS(K))+)+H_2 := \beth_{\left(2^{\beth_{\left(2^{\operatorname{LS} (K)}\right)^+}}\right)^+}. If KK is categorical in a λ>H2\lambda > H_2, then KK is categorical in all λH2\lambda' \ge H_2.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1506.07024,
  title  = {Shelah's eventual categoricity conjecture in universal classes: part I},
  author = {Sebastien Vasey},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.07024},
  year   = {2017}
}

Comments

51 pages