Separating Subversion Forcing Axioms
Logic
2025-08-06 v2
Abstract
We study a family of variants of Jensen's\emph{subcomplete forcing axiom}, and \emph{subproper forcing axiom}, . Using these we develop a general technique for proving non-implications of , and their relatives and give several applications. For instance we show that does not imply -closed and does not imply Martin's Maximum.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2308.16276,
title = {Separating Subversion Forcing Axioms},
author = {Hiroshi Sakai and Corey Bacal Switzer},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.16276},
year = {2025}
}
Comments
19 pages, 1 figure, updated version addresses many helpful comments of the anonymous referee which helped clean up the text and clarify both the exposition and the proofs