English

Self-consistent redshift estimation using correlation functions without a spectroscopic reference sample

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics 2019-09-09 v2 Astrophysics of Galaxies

Abstract

We present a new method to estimate redshift distributions and galaxy-dark matter bias parameters using correlation functions in a fully data driven and self-consistent manner. Unlike other machine learning, template, or correlation redshift methods, this approach does not require a reference sample with known redshifts. By measuring the projected cross- and auto- correlations of different galaxy sub-samples, e.g., as chosen by simple cells in color-magnitude space, we are able to estimate the galaxy-dark matter bias model parameters, and the shape of the redshift distributions of each sub-sample. This method fully marginalises over a flexible parameterisation of the redshift distribution and galaxy-dark matter bias parameters of sub-samples of galaxies, and thus provides a general Bayesian framework to incorporate redshift uncertainty into the cosmological analysis in a data-driven, consistent, and reproducible manner. This result is improved by an order of magnitude by including cross-correlations with the CMB and with galaxy-galaxy lensing. We showcase how this method could be applied to real galaxies. By using idealised data vectors, in which all galaxy-dark matter model parameters and redshift distributions are known, this method is demonstrated to recover unbiased estimates on important quantities, such as the offset Δz\Delta_z between the mean of the true and estimated redshift distribution and the 68\% and 95\% and 99.5\% widths of the redshift distribution to an accuracy required by current and future surveys.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1802.02581,
  title  = {Self-consistent redshift estimation using correlation functions without a spectroscopic reference sample},
  author = {Ben Hoyle and Markus Michael Rau},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.02581},
  year   = {2019}
}

Comments

20pages, 11 figures, text revised for clarification, version accepted by journal, conclusions unchanged