English

Sculpting the sub-Saturn Occurrence Rate via Atmospheric Mass Loss

Earth and Planetary Astrophysics 2022-01-12 v2

Abstract

The sub-Saturn (\sim4--8RR_{\oplus}) occurrence rate rises with orbital period out to at least \sim300 days. In this work we adopt and test the hypothesis that the decrease in their occurrence towards the star is a result of atmospheric mass loss, which can transform sub-Saturns into sub-Neptunes (\lesssim4RR_{\oplus}) more efficiently at shorter periods. We show that under the mass loss hypothesis, the sub-Saturn occurrence rate can be leveraged to infer their underlying core mass function, and by extension that of gas giants. We determine that lognormal core mass functions peaked near \sim10--20MM_{\oplus} are compatible with the sub-Saturn period distribution, the distribution of observationally-inferred sub-Saturn cores, and gas accretion theories. Our theory predicts that close-in sub-Saturns should be \sim50\% less common and \sim30\% more massive around rapidly rotating stars; this should be directly testable for stars younger than \lesssim500 Myr. We also predict that the sub-Jovian desert becomes less pronounced and opens up at smaller orbital periods around M stars compared to solar-type stars (\sim0.7 days vs.~\sim3 days). We demonstrate that exceptionally low-density sub-Saturns, "Super-Puffs", can survive intense hydrodynamic escape to the present day if they are born with even larger atmospheres than they currently harbor; in this picture, Kepler 223 d began with an envelope \sim1.5×\times the mass of its core and is currently losing its envelope at a rate \sim2×103M Myr1\times 10^{-3}M_{\oplus}~\mathrm{Myr}^{-1}. If the predictions from our theory are confirmed by observations, the core mass function we predict can also serve to constrain core formation theories of gas-rich planets.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2105.12746,
  title  = {Sculpting the sub-Saturn Occurrence Rate via Atmospheric Mass Loss},
  author = {Tim Hallatt and Eve J. Lee},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.12746},
  year   = {2022}
}

Comments

Accepted to ApJ