Scientific Productivity, Research Funding, Race and Ethnicity
Abstract
In a recent study by Ginther et al., the probability of receiving a U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) RO1 award was related to the applicant's race/ethnicity. The results indicate black/African-American applicants were 10% less likely than white peers to receive an award, after controlling for background and qualifications. It has generated a widespread debate regarding the unfairness of the NIH grant review process and its correction. In this paper, the work by Ginther et al. was augmented by pairing analysis, axiomatically-individualized productivity and normalized funding success measurement. Although there are racial differences in R01 grant success rates, normalized figures of merit for funding success explain the discrepancy. The suggested "leverage points for policy intervention" are in question and require deeper and more thorough investigations. Further adjustments in policies to remove racial disparity should be made more systematically for equal opportunity, rather than being limited to the NIH review process.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.1112.3944,
title = {Scientific Productivity, Research Funding, Race and Ethnicity},
author = {J. S. Yang and M. W. Vannier and F. Wang and Y. Deng and F. R. Ou and J. R. Bennett and Y. Liu and G. Wang},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1112.3944},
year = {2011}
}
Comments
12 pages, 5 tables, and 46 references