Science Under Attack
Abstract
Some attack scientific rationality, others defend it, but both miss the point. What both parties take to be scientific rationality is actually a species of irrationality masquerading as scientific rationality. The current orthodox conception of science, taken for granted by scientists and non-scientists alike, is irrational because it suppresses problematic assumptions, inherent in the aims of science, having to do with metaphysics, values, and political and social issues. We urgently need a more rigorous conception of science to be adopted and implemented that honestly acknowledges the problematic character of the aims of science, and seeks to improve them as science proceeds.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2001.10416,
title = {Science Under Attack},
author = {Nicholas Maxwell},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.10416},
year = {2020}
}
Comments
5 pages. This paper argues that the conception of science taken for granted by the scientific community is irrational. We need a more rigorous conception - and kind - of science that is more honest about the problematic aims of science