English

Scattering matrix pole expansions for complex wavenumbers in $R$-matrix theory

Nuclear Theory 2021-06-23 v1

Abstract

In this follow-up article to [Shadow poles in the alternative parametrization of R-matrix theory, Ducru (2020)], we establish new results on scattering matrix pole expansions for complex wavenumbers in R-matrix theory. In the past, two branches of theoretical formalisms emerged to describe the scattering matrix in nuclear physics: R-matrix theory, and pole expansions. The two have been quite isolated from one another. Recently, our study of Brune's alternative parametrization of R-matrix theory has shown the need to extend the scattering matrix (and the underlying R-matrix operators) to complex wavenumbers. Two competing ways of doing so have emerged from a historical ambiguity in the definitions of the shift S\boldsymbol{S} and penetration P\boldsymbol{P} functions: the legacy Lane \& Thomas "force closure" approach, versus analytic continuation (which is the standard in mathematical physics). The R-matrix community has not yet come to a consensus as to which to adopt for evaluations in standard nuclear data libraries, such as ENDF. In this article, we argue in favor of analytic continuation of R-matrix operators. We bridge R-matrix theory with the Humblet-Rosenfeld pole expansions, and unveil new properties of the Siegert-Humblet radioactive poles and widths, including their invariance properties to changes in channel radii aca_c. We then show that analytic continuation of R-matrix operators preserves important physical and mathematical properties of the scattering matrix -- cancelling spurious poles and guaranteeing generalized unitarity -- while still being able to close channels below thresholds.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2010.14062,
  title  = {Scattering matrix pole expansions for complex wavenumbers in $R$-matrix theory},
  author = {Pablo Ducru and Vladimir Sobes and Gerald Hale and Mark Paris and Benoit Forget},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.14062},
  year   = {2021}
}

Comments

Under review in Phys. Rev. C. 23 pages, 1 figure, 1 table. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1903.02661

R2 v1 2026-06-23T19:40:30.202Z