Scalable DP-SGD: Shuffling vs. Poisson Subsampling
Abstract
We provide new lower bounds on the privacy guarantee of the multi-epoch Adaptive Batch Linear Queries (ABLQ) mechanism with shuffled batch sampling, demonstrating substantial gaps when compared to Poisson subsampling; prior analysis was limited to a single epoch. Since the privacy analysis of Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) is obtained by analyzing the ABLQ mechanism, this brings into serious question the common practice of implementing shuffling-based DP-SGD, but reporting privacy parameters as if Poisson subsampling was used. To understand the impact of this gap on the utility of trained machine learning models, we introduce a practical approach to implement Poisson subsampling at scale using massively parallel computation, and efficiently train models with the same. We compare the utility of models trained with Poisson-subsampling-based DP-SGD, and the optimistic estimates of utility when using shuffling, via our new lower bounds on the privacy guarantee of ABLQ with shuffling.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2411.04205,
title = {Scalable DP-SGD: Shuffling vs. Poisson Subsampling},
author = {Lynn Chua and Badih Ghazi and Pritish Kamath and Ravi Kumar and Pasin Manurangsi and Amer Sinha and Chiyuan Zhang},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.04205},
year = {2024}
}
Comments
To appear at NeurIPS 2024