Satellite Quenching and Galactic Conformity at 0.3 < z < 2.5
Abstract
We measure the evolution of the quiescent fraction and quenching efficiency of satellites around star-forming and quiescent central galaxies with stellar mass at . We combine imaging from three deep near-infrared-selected surveys (ZFOURGE/CANDELS, UDS, and UltraVISTA), which allows us to select a stellar-mass complete sample of satellites with . Satellites for both star-forming and quiescent central galaxies have higher quiescent fractions compared to field galaxies matched in stellar mass at all redshifts. We also observe "galactic conformity": satellites around quiescent centrals are more likely to be quenched compared to the satellites around star-forming centrals. In our sample, this conformity signal is significant at for , whereas it is only weakly significant at and . Therefore, conformity (and therefore satellite quenching) has been present for a significant fraction of the age of the universe. The satellite quenching efficiency increases with increasing stellar mass of the central, but does not appear to depend on the stellar mass of the satellite to the mass limit of our sample. When we compare the satellite quenching efficiency of star-forming centrals with stellar masses 0.2 dex higher than quiescent centrals (which should account for any difference in halo mass), the conformity signal decreases, but remains statistically significant at . This is evidence that satellite quenching is connected to the star-formation properties of the central as well as to the mass of the halo. We discuss physical effects that may contribute to galactic conformity, and emphasize that they must allow for continued star-formation in the central galaxy even as the satellites are quenched.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.1511.02862,
title = {Satellite Quenching and Galactic Conformity at 0.3 < z < 2.5},
author = {Lalitwadee Kawinwanichakij and Ryan F. Quadri and Casey Papovich and Glenn G. Kacprzak and Ivo Labbé and Lee R. Spitler and Caroline Straatman and Kim-Vy Tran and Rebecca Allen and Peter S. Behroozi and Michael Cowley and Avishai Dekel and Karl Glazebrook and William G. Hartley and Daniel D. Kelson and David C. Koo and Seong-Kook Lee and Yu Lu and Themiya Nanayakkara and Eric Persson and Joel R. Primack and Vithal Tilvi and Adam R. Tomczak and Pieter van Dokkum},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.02862},
year = {2016}
}
Comments
Submitted to ApJ after first round of referee comments, 22 pages, 12 figures