Sampling Humans for Optimizing Preferences in Coloring Artwork
Abstract
Many circumstances of practical importance have performance or success metrics which exist implicitly---in the eye of the beholder, so to speak. Tuning aspects of such problems requires working without defined metrics and only considering pairwise comparisons or rankings. In this paper, we review an existing Bayesian optimization strategy for determining most-preferred outcomes, and identify an adaptation to allow it to handle ties. We then discuss some of the issues we have encountered when humans use this optimization strategy to optimize coloring a piece of abstract artwork. We hope that, by participating in this workshop, we can learn how other researchers encounter difficulties unique to working with humans in the loop.
Cite
@article{arxiv.1906.03813,
title = {Sampling Humans for Optimizing Preferences in Coloring Artwork},
author = {Michael McCourt and Ian Dewancker},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.03813},
year = {2019}
}
Comments
6 pages, 4 figures, presented at 2019 ICML Workshop on Human in the Loop Learning (HILL 2019), Long Beach, USA