English

Robust Preference for Dynamical Dark Energy in DESI BAO and SN Measurements

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics 2024-10-11 v2 High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

Abstract

Recent Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) measurements released by DESI, when combined with Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) data from Planck and two different samples of Type Ia supernovae (Pantheon-Plus and DESY5) reveal a preference for Dynamical Dark Energy (DDE) characterized by a present-day quintessence-like equation of state that crossed into the phantom regime in the past. A core ansatz for this result is assuming a linear Chevallier-Polarski-Linder (CPL) parameterization w(a)=w0+wa(1a)w(a) = w_0 + w_a (1-a) to describe the evolution of the DE equation of state (EoS). In this paper, we test if and to what extent this assumption impacts the results. To prevent broadening uncertainties in cosmological parameter inference and facilitate direct comparison with the baseline CPL case, we focus on 4 alternative well-known models that, just like CPL, consist of only two free parameters: the present-day DE EoS (w0w_0) and a parameter quantifying its dynamical evolution (waw_a). We demonstrate that the preference for DDE remains robust regardless of the parameterization: w0w_0 consistently remains in the quintessence regime, while waw_a consistently indicates a preference for a dynamical evolution towards the phantom regime. This tendency is significantly strengthened by DESY5 SN measurements. By comparing the best-fit χ2\chi^2 obtained within each DDE model, we notice that the linear CPL parameterization is not the best-fitting case. Among the models considered, the EoS proposed by Barboza and Alcaniz consistently leads to the most significant improvement.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2407.16689,
  title  = {Robust Preference for Dynamical Dark Energy in DESI BAO and SN Measurements},
  author = {William Giarè and Mahdi Najafi and Supriya Pan and Eleonora Di Valentino and Javad T. Firouzjaee},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.16689},
  year   = {2024}
}

Comments

44 pages, 7 figures, 7 tables. V2: additional references, more details and discussion on the results and their interpretation, added a new Appendix presenting additional constraints on interesting properties of the DE EoS across the different models analyzed. Version accepted for publication in JCAP