Risk-Adjusted learning curve assessment using comparative probability metrics
Abstract
Surgical learning curves are graphical tools used to evaluate a trainee's progress in the early stages of their career and determine whether they have achieved proficiency after completing a specified number of surgeries. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) techniques are commonly used to assess learning curves due to their simplicity, but they face criticism for relying on fixed performance thresholds and lacking interpretability. This paper introduces a risk-adjusted surgical learning curve assessment (SLCA) method that focuses on estimation rather than hypothesis testing, as seen in CUSUM methods. The method is designed to accommodate right-skewed outcomes, such as surgery durations, characterized by the Weibull distribution. To evaluate the learning process, the SLCA approach estimates comparative probability metrics that assess the likelihood of a clinically important difference between the trainee's performance and a standard. Expecting improvement over time, we use weighted estimating equations to give greater weight to recent outcomes. Compared to CUSUM methods, SLCA offers enhanced interpretability, avoids reliance on externally defined performance levels, and emphasizes assessing clinical equivalence or noninferiority. We demonstrate the method's effectiveness through a colorectal surgery dataset case study and a numerical study.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2501.11637,
title = {Risk-Adjusted learning curve assessment using comparative probability metrics},
author = {Adel Ahmadi Nadi and Stefan Steiner and Nathaniel Stevens},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.11637},
year = {2025}
}