Rigidity versus flexibility for tight confoliations
Abstract
In \cite{confol} Y. Eliashberg and W. Thurston gave a definition of tight confoliations. We give an example of a tight confoliation on violating the Thurston-Bennequin inequalities. This answers a question from \cite{confol} negatively. Although the tightness of a confoliation does not imply the Thurston-Bennequin inequalities, it is still possible to prove restrictions on homotopy classes of plane fields which contain tight confoliations. The failure of the Thurston-Bennequin inequalities for tight confoliations is due to the presence of overtwisted stars. Overtwisted stars are particular configurations of Legendrian curves which bound a disc with finitely many punctures on the boundary. We prove that the Thurston-Bennequin inequalities hold for tight confoliations without overtwisted stars and that symplectically fillable confoliations do not admit overtwisted stars.
Cite
@article{arxiv.0901.1096,
title = {Rigidity versus flexibility for tight confoliations},
author = {T. Vogel},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:0901.1096},
year = {2015}
}
Comments
84 pages, 20 figures, almost equal to the published version. Several improvements of the exposition, results remain unchanged