English

Revisiting the Classics: On the Statistics of Dust Formation in Novae

High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena 2025-01-09 v1 Astrophysics of Galaxies Solar and Stellar Astrophysics

Abstract

While nova eruptions produce some of the most common and dramatic dust formation episodes among astrophysical transients, the demographics of dust-forming novae remain poorly understood. Here, we present a statistical study of dust formation in 40 novae with high-quality optical/IR light curves, quantitatively distinguishing dust-forming from non-dust-forming novae while exploring the properties of the dust events. We find that 50-70% of novae produce dust, significantly higher than previous estimates. Dust-forming novae can be separated from those that do not show dust formation by using the largest redward (VKV-K) colour change from peak visible brightness; (VJV-J) or (VHV-H) offer useful but less sensitive constraints. This makes optical+IR photometry a powerful tool to quantify dust formation in novae. We find that novae detected in GeV γ\gamma-rays by \emph{Fermi}-LAT appear to form dust more often than novae not detected by \emph{Fermi}, implying a possible connection between γ\gamma-ray producing shocks and dust production. We also find that novae that evolve very quickly (t2<10t_2 < 10 days) are much less likely to form dust, in agreement with previous findings. We confirm a correlation between t2t_2 and the time of the onset of dust formation (which occurs \sim1 week--3 months after maximum light), but conclude that it is primarily an observational artifact driven by dust formation determining when a nova drops 2 mag below peak. The significant fraction of novae that form dust make them ideal laboratories in our Galactic backyard to tackle the puzzle of dust formation around explosive transients.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2501.04098,
  title  = {Revisiting the Classics: On the Statistics of Dust Formation in Novae},
  author = {Atticus Chong and Elias Aydi and Peter Craig and Laura Chomiuk and Ashley Stone and Jay Strader and Adam Kawash and Kirill V. Sokolovsky and Fred Walter},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.04098},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

23 pages, 58 figures, 1 table, submitted to MNRAS