English

Revisiting RFID Missing Tag Identification

Networking and Internet Architecture 2025-10-22 v1 Data Structures and Algorithms

Abstract

We revisit the problem of missing tag identification in RFID networks by making three contributions. Firstly, we quantitatively compare and gauge the existing propositions spanning over a decade on missing tag identification. We show that the expected execution time of the best solution in the literature is Θ(N+(1α)2(1δ)2ϵ2)\Theta \left(N+\frac{(1-\alpha)^2(1-\delta)^2}{ \epsilon^2}\right), where δ\delta and ϵ\epsilon are parameters quantifying the required identification accuracy, NN denotes the number of tags in the system, among which αN\alpha N tags are missing. Secondly, we analytically establish the expected execution time lower-bound for any missing tag identification algorithm as Θ(NlogN+(1δ)2(1α)2ϵ2log(1δ)(1α)ϵ)\Theta\left(\frac{N}{\log N}+\frac{(1-\delta)^2(1-\alpha)^2}{\epsilon^2 \log \frac{(1-\delta)(1-\alpha)}{\epsilon}}\right), thus giving the theoretical performance limit. Thirdly, we develop a novel missing tag identification algorithm by leveraging a tree structure with the expected execution time of Θ(loglogNlogNN+(1α)2(1δ)2ϵ2)\Theta \left(\frac{\log\log N}{\log N}N+\frac{(1-\alpha)^2(1-\delta)^2}{ \epsilon^2}\right), reducing the time overhead by a factor of up to logN\log N over the best algorithm in the literature. The key technicality in our design is a novel data structure termed as collision-partition tree (CPT), built on a subset of bits in tag pseudo-IDs, leading to more balanced tree structure and reducing the time complexity in parsing the entire tree.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2510.18285,
  title  = {Revisiting RFID Missing Tag Identification},
  author = {Kanghuai Liu and Lin Chen and Jihong Yu and Junyi Huang and Shiyuan Liu},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.18285},
  year   = {2025}
}
R2 v1 2026-07-01T06:57:07.187Z