The escalating volume of academic research, coupled with a shortage of qualified reviewers, necessitates innovative approaches to peer review. In this work, we propose: 1. ReviewEval, a comprehensive evaluation framework for AI-generated reviews that measures alignment with human assessments, verifies factual accuracy, assesses analytical depth, identifies degree of constructiveness and adherence to reviewer guidelines; and 2. ReviewAgent, an LLM-based review generation agent featuring a novel alignment mechanism to tailor feedback to target conferences and journals, along with a self-refinement loop that iteratively optimizes its intermediate outputs and an external improvement loop using ReviewEval to improve upon the final reviews. ReviewAgent improves actionable insights by 6.78% and 47.62% over existing AI baselines and expert reviews respectively. Further, it boosts analytical depth by 3.97% and 12.73%, enhances adherence to guidelines by 10.11% and 47.26% respectively. This paper establishes essential metrics for AIbased peer review and substantially enhances the reliability and impact of AI-generated reviews in academic research.
@article{arxiv.2502.11736,
title = {ReviewEval: An Evaluation Framework for AI-Generated Reviews},
author = {Madhav Krishan Garg and Tejash Prasad and Tanmay Singhal and Chhavi Kirtani and Murari Mandal and Dhruv Kumar},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.11736},
year = {2025}
}
Comments
Under review: 8 pages, 2 figures, 5 tables, 9 pages for appendix