English

Rethinking Polyhedrality for Lindenstrauss Spaces

Functional Analysis 2015-06-30 v1

Abstract

A recent example by the authors (see arXiv:1503.09088 [math.FA]) shows that an old result of Zippin about the existence of an isometric copy of cc in a separable Lindenstrauss space is incorrect. The same example proves that some characterizations of polyhedral Lindenstrauss spaces, based on the result of Zippin, are false. The main result of the present paper provides a new characterization of polyhedrality for the preduals of 1\ell_{1} and gives a correct proof for one of the older. Indeed, we prove that for a space XX such that X=1X^{*}=\ell_{1} the following properties are equivalent: (1) XX is a polyhedral space; (2) XX does not contain an isometric copy of cc; (3) sup{x(x):xext(BX)D(x)}<1\sup\left\{ x^{*}(x)\,:\, x^{*}\in\mathrm{ext}\left(B_{X^{*}}\right)\setminus D(x)\right\} <1 for each xSXx\in S_{X}, where D(x)={xSX:x(x)=1}D(x)=\left\{ x^{*}\in S_{X^{*}}:x^{*}(x)=1\right\}. By known theory, from our result follows that a generic Lindenstrauss space is polyhedral if and only if it does not contain an isometric copy of cc. Moreover, a correct version of the result of Zippin is derived as a corollary of the main result.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1506.08559,
  title  = {Rethinking Polyhedrality for Lindenstrauss Spaces},
  author = {Emanuele Casini and Enrico Miglierina and Łukasz Piasecki},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.08559},
  year   = {2015}
}
R2 v1 2026-06-22T10:01:57.822Z